DOJ, Banks and DeFi Back Suit to Kill Illinois 0.2% Crypto Tax
The DOJ, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, SIFMA and a crypto coalition led by a16z, Paradigm and Uniswap filed briefs backing a challenge to Illinois' 0.2% levy on digital asset trades.
An unusually broad coalition spanning the U.S. Justice Department, Wall Street's biggest lobby, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and a who's-who of crypto firms has thrown its weight behind a legal challenge to Illinois' first-of-its-kind tax on digital asset transactions, according to Decrypt.
The groups filed briefs this month in Illinois state court supporting a lawsuit from the Crypto Council for Innovation and the Blockchain Association, which are asking a judge to strike down the state's Digital Asset Tax Act and permanently block its enforcement. The challenge dates to August.
Instant Telegram notifications for large on-chain moves.
What the tax does
The law imposes a 0.2% levy on the full value of a digital asset every time an Illinois customer trades, transfers or stores it through a broker, even when there is no sale, gain or change in ownership. Critics call it among the most punitive crypto taxes in the country, in part because Illinois imposes no comparable tax on dollars, gold, stocks or any other asset, and no other state has anything like it.
Who filed briefs
The Justice Department filed a statement of interest on Nov. 6 arguing the tax undermines federal policy and U.S. leadership in digital assets, calling it vague and discriminatory for singling out crypto for treatment no other asset faces.
The Chamber of Commerce and the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, which represents hundreds of broker-dealers, banks and asset managers, filed an amicus brief warning the tax reaches well beyond crypto-native platforms to the traditional banks, custodians and advisers increasingly offering digital asset products.
A separate brief filed Nov. 11 brought together crypto's heavy hitters, led by the DeFi Education Fund, Andreessen Horowitz, Paradigm and Uniswap, and including Aave Labs, Chainlink Labs, Solana Policy Institute, Phantom, Jito Labs, Multicoin Capital and Stand With Crypto. It argues the law's definitions are so vague they could stretch to software developers and decentralized protocols that hold no customer funds and have no way to identify users or know where a transaction occurred. The brief noted an estimated 2.64 million Illinoisans hold digital assets, the fifth-highest total of any state.
"This tax is unclear, discriminatory, unconstitutional, and harmful to the future of finance," CCI CEO Ji Hun Kim and Blockchain Association executive Ashok Pinto said in a joint statement.
Where the case stands
Illinois agreed in October to pause the tax until July 1, 2027, according to Decrypt, buying time for the court fight now underway.
Key facts
- The Digital Asset Tax Act imposes a 0.2% levy on a digital asset's full value each time an Illinois customer trades, transfers or stores it through a broker.
- The DOJ filed a statement of interest on Nov. 6 calling the tax vague and discriminatory.
- The Chamber of Commerce and SIFMA filed an amicus brief; a Nov. 11 brief was led by the DeFi Education Fund, a16z, Paradigm and Uniswap.
- An estimated 2.64 million Illinoisans hold digital assets, the fifth-highest total of any state.
- Illinois paused the tax until July 1, 2027.
Source: decrypt.co
This article is for information only and is not investment advice. BullishMarketCap news is produced with AI assistance from public sources and reviewed by our editors; see our editorial policy. Spotted an error? Tell us.
